Re: [Bulk] Re: Using Polymer Webcomponents in seaside
Sebastian Heidbrink <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I do not think that that makes any difference. I once tried to integrate Amber with RiverTrail and there was no way to get access to the Amber context within RiverTrail and vice versa. At least at that time.... Amber has a great environment to maintain all the prerequisites of your application. The whole installation and maintenance bundle that Herby setup is really sophisticated and takes a lot of JS burden from the Smalltalk developer. PharoJS has nothing like that to offer, yet. On 2015-12-01 5:38 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Would Polymer fit better in Amber rather than PharoJS? > > > > > > ----- > Brad Selfridge > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Using-Polymer-Webcomponents-in-seaside-tp4864427p4864538.html > Sent from the Seaside General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >