Re: Workaround to browser maximum connection limit ?

Are you using HTTP/2 in your nginx config?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP/2  It both multiplexes & pipelines
requests so the browser's limits have less, if no effect.



Could also maybe adapt the functionality of the lazy-loading code that is
sometimes used for images.  If the report isn't on the screen & hasn't been
scrolled to do you really need it in the DOM?







Mariano Martinez Peck wrote
> Hi guys,
> 
> In my app I have one scenario where we render huge reports. These reports
> could have say... 20/30 large tables as well as quite some charts and some
> other report elements.
> 
> Previously we were using a single ajax request to generate the whole
> report
> html but that was a pain because client machine would have a really large
> TTFB. So I was wasting CPU and network at client machine while waiting.
> 
> What we did now is that each report element renders a title + spinning
> while and does an ajax request which, on success does a #replaceWith: 
> with
> the real contents. The idea is to show the report as soon as possible and
> start replacing spinning wheels with real contents as soon as content is
> ready. That way I maximize CPU and network on client side.
> 
> The second thing is that making this on AJAX calls, that would end up on
> different Gems on my GemStone which was very performant. I have 10 Seaside
> gems on a 8 cores CPU so all those AJAX request were load balanced via
> nginx over the 10 seaside gems, which on the other hand were split across
> all cores. Previously, with a single request, only one Gem took care and
> hence only one CPU core was used.
> 
> This change was nice and improved performance. However, when I analyze
> requests, I see that I have many that are "Stalled". And yeah, on Chrome,
> they are all stalled when there is more than 6 requests to the same
> location.
> 
> To conclude, it looks like i am doing what is called "Loading page content
> with many Ajax requests" [1]. But I still don't find an easy workaround. I
> would like to be able to use my 10 Gems over the 8 CPU cores....
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://sgdev-blog.blogspot.com.ar/2014/01/maximum-concurrent-connection-to-same.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list

> [email protected]

> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside





--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Workaround-to-browser-maximum-connection-limit-tp4939444p4939450.html
Sent from the Seaside General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside