Re: Lock and Unlock http verbs
Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bruno, Seems like your implementation is correct. Are the LOCK and UNLOCK verbs part of an HTTP spec? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4 It doesn't seem like they're part of HTTP/1.1 so maybe thats why they're not implemented in Seaside. Hope this helps Paul BrunoBB wrote > Hi, > > Implementing a service layer for Orbeon Forms needs lock and unlock verbs > for some persistence services. > > These two verbs are ignored by Seaside Rest (using Seside GemStone > version). > > Following routes implementation i reached WARouteBuilder and methods on > category "configuration methods". > > After implementing in WARouteBuilder: > lock > > <configuration> > self method: 'LOCK' > > The service (with lock verb) started to work. > > Why these methods are not implemented by default ? > Is this implementation correct ? > > regards, > bruno > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Seaside-General-f86180.html > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Seaside-General-f86180.html _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside