Re: Why is Scratch more popular than Etoys?
Maria Droujkova <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.education.sugar.discuss,gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.squeakland |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALVrbegHg=yJsmDfp2GqHdxCPvj70hRZOD8+uzwy+FA1krWGHg@mail.gmail.com> |
Scratch looks a bit more sleek (modern?) and is a bit easier to use. I think these bits add up. I think Scratch has easier media tools, but I may be mistaken there - maybe I just don't know how to use Etoys media tools. Cheers, Maria Droujkova 919-388-1721 Make math your own, to make your own math On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Steve Thomas <sthomas1-gQhbkF4bah9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > I have taught both Scratch and Etoys to kids and hands down most kids > prefer Scratch. I also prefer Scratch for certain things, but prefer Etoys > for most learning and teaching. > > What can we learn from Scratch (and TurtleArt et al) to improve Etoys? And > vice versa what can be done to improve Scratch? > . > I have ideas, which I will share later, but I am curious to hear the > thoughts of others (as mine add nothing to my current understanding and > repeating them will simply further ingrain incomplete and incorrect > assumptions and prejudices ;) > > Stephen > P.S. I fully believe kids should learn multiple languages and am not > looking for the "one ring to rule them all." Each language/environment has > its advantages and we need multiple. > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP-g/[email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >