Re: [IAEP] Why is Scratch more popular than Etoys?
karl ramberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.squeakland,gmane.comp.education.sugar.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGzzWLihOmf6Fy1m5WOm5v5Ef5Vwoqfh1h1BHhOPpiem+=NYrQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. <jecel-/J8iz1DznIp8UrSeD/[email protected]> wrote: > About programming for the masses, I see two educational reasons to > insist on that. One (rather weak) reason is to demystify something that > is everywhere. People will be dealing with software all the time and if > having done one or two toy applications as a child makes them see that > it is not magic then that is nice. > > A much better reason is Papert's: so the children will have an object to > think with. The idea is to learn to learn but we need a suitable way to > talk about learning strategies. Normal school tends to encourage a very > poor strategy: take a guess, see if the teacher confirms it is right and > if not take another guess. Not only is the search time long and > unbounded, you also need some external way of checking your results > which is something you won't always have. > > Teaching programming is just a way to be able to teach debugging, or > successive approximation. You don't throw away incorrect attempts but > instead build on them. And you learn to figure out for yourself if they > are correct or not, and how far and in what way they are incorrect so > you know what to change. With Etoy now we have few projects that challenges a notion and show you a way to get there. We have the project showing the most basic stuff. I think we need more projects that features aspects of the system and how to use them. Of course Mr.Steve has made many nice videos :-) http://mrstevesscience.blogspot.com/ Karl