Re: [IAEP] Why is Scratch more popular than Etoys?

"K. K. Subramaniam" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.squeakland
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 11:51:15 AM Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
> Le 19/09/2011 19:05, K. K. Subramaniam a écrit :
> > On Monday 19 Sep 2011 2:27:55 AM Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:
> >> About programming for the masses, I see two educational reasons to
> >> insist on that.
> > 
> > The debates about programmin I encounter is usually around "how" and not
> > "why".
> 
> I am not really sure programming should be the focus point. In Scratch
> it is but,
> is not connecting ideas and concepts the focus point in Etoys, and
> programming a small mean to get there?
"Programming" is just a common way of referring to the process of giving shape 
to ideas on a computer. Such a process is very error-prone (due in no small 
part to the crude tools available) and requires a person to apply both 
inductive and deductive ("debugging") skills to perfect the creation. The 
creation becomes important in a business context but not in an educational 
context.

Programming in Etoys is like juggling. What is the end-product of juggling? 
Why are people fascinated by juggling?

A village school teacher related an incident of a 4th grader with poor writing 
skills who, after spending a few weeks typesetting letter shapes using 
LatexMorph, broke into a torrent of writing. I have also come across other 
cases where Etoys (once past the initial chasm) triggered a big jump in 
learning levels. To me, this is the most fascinating aspect of Etoys.

Regards .. Subbu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.