Re: porting strategy
"Thiago Silva" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Dave (the other), Just to complement, have you read the issues page of the project? http://code.google.com/p/strongtalk/issues/list On 2/8/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > I'm curious as to what the general thought is in terms of ports -- > that is what is the preferred approach to dealing with multiple OS's > for Strongtalk. A review of the mailing list would seem to indicate > that the OS's of interest are MacOS, Linux, Solaris, and MS; did I > miss any? > > I see four primary areas of concern -- > > 1. toolsets: that is, VisualStudio v. GCC v. MingW. > 2. Windowing Environments -- MS v. X (GTK would be my vote) v. MAC > 3. Operating Systems MS v. *nix (and potentially BSD vs SysV) I'll > go with the working assumption that MacOS X+ is the target there, so > the BSD v. SysV covers that. > 4. Image files > > I ask because I'm attempting to suss out the best way to approach a > linux port and I'm hoping that others have already thought through > this one -- I'm bear of very little brain. > > regards, > (The other) Dave. > -- Thiago Silva Blog: http://www.sourcecraft.info/blog Jabber: [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---