Re: porting of assembler code ...
"prunedtree" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That's obviously the way to go. However, if you simply want to compile the VM on another OS, you don't need to port the assembly code if your linker can deal with COFF object files. Removing dependencies on the assembly code is trivial, but not really a priority. Ideally, all changes related to OS porting should be strictly encapsulated into the os class of course. Porting to any x86-32 platform shouldn't be hard, the VM has very few dependencies on the operating system: virtual memory, threading, exception handling and dynamic libs Most of the platform-specific code is in the smalltalk part of the system, not the VM. prunedtree --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---