Re: Project Direction

Marten <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1 Mai, 02:22, "David Griswold" <[email protected]> wrote:

> that I ever thought there was that high a probability of that happening
> immediately, but it was worth a shot to see if the Smalltalk community would
> rise to the occasion.  Dan Ingalls even offered a $5,000 reward last year

I think, that the commercial Smalltalk vendors have other problems and
therefore
there is little interest in looking at the VM technology or stuff like
this.

I've posted about Strongtalk in the VASmalltalk forum, but the result
were
more or less pretty clear: Smalltalk speed is not criticial for lots
of
customers any more - its nice to have it faster, but its not critical
any
more - only a few persons making heavy computations would love to see
some
more speed.

For the other thing: the optional type system: well I would love to
see it in
VASmalltalk, but I assume, that type systems are not a hot topic at
all
in the community these days.

Therefore the community has other things to do ...


Marten


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.