RE: Building on linux

"David Griswold" <[email protected]> Mon, 7 May 2007 13:10:26 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
That's terrific!  I'll start reviewing the code and attempting to check it
in.

I know there is has been some code exchange back and forth on the list
without the code being committed; if this includes other people's changes
too please let me know so I can credit everyone appropriately when I commit
the code.

Also, you don't mention it, but I'm hoping that this code also compiles and
runs ok under VC++?  We haven't yet had to branch the code base for
gcc/Linux/MacOS ports.  I'm open to advice on the best way to do that
when/if it is necessary.

- Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of prunedtree
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:40 PM
> To: Strongtalk-general
> Subject: Re: Building on linux
>
>
>
> Building with GCC now works. Tested with mingw32-3.4.4
>
> Stability with the recompiler isn't optimal yet, but it's not
> mandatory to run the system.
>
> Here's the source :
>
> http://www.sendspace.com/file/p9c3nf         strongtalk r36-noasm3 VM
> pack.zip       1263 kbytes
>
> Project files for VC6 and CodeBlocks included.
> To build this code with GCC, the following switches are needed :
> -fno-const-strings
> -fno-for-scope
> -fno-operator-names
>
> cheers,
> prunedtree
>
> On 27 avr, 21:31, prunedtree <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Regarding assembly, I finished to get rid of inline assembly in the VM
> > (mostly by replacing code by C equivalents, or using code generation
> > where appropriate), and strongtalk compiles successfully with gcc on
> > windows (mingw).
> >
> > The resulting binary doesn't work fully yet (problems in the OS layer)
> >
> > With this done, language-level issues are solved, the major issue to
> > port the VM to linux is now OS interaction.
> >
> > Btw, if you disable os::message_box, strongtalk on windows XP has only
> > dependencies on kernel32.dll. Hence porting the VM looks fairly easy.
> > But much code won't work in the image (I/O, UI, etc ..)
> >
> > I'll provide the sourcecode if anyone is interressed, but it's still
> > work in progress.
> >
> > regards,
> > prunedtree
> >
> > On Apr 26, 2:28 pm, "Dave Raymer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The patches are for the C++ files only; the .ASM files have
> not be ported /
> > > dealt with yet.
> >
> > > -- the other Dave
> >
> > > On 4/24/07, jpraher <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Sorry, I did not realize that someone has already submitted some
> > > > patches.
> >
> > > > I will look at them and try them out.
> > > > -- Jakob
> >
> > > > On Apr 24, 5:10 pm, jpraher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > hi everybody,
> >
> > > > > is strontalk currently runnable on linux?
> > > > > which areas of the code are windows-secific? (e.g.
> windowing and stuff
> > > > > like that)
> > > > > is anybody working on a build system on non windows platforms?
> >
> > > > > i am primarily interested in the virtual machine.
> > > > > so i just would like to have a command line interpreter
> to start with
> > > > > that runs on linux.
> >
> > > > > thanks in advance
> > > > > -- Jakob
> >
> > > --
> > > A man's greatest treasure is his wife, she is a gift from the Lord
> > > - Proverbs 18:22
>
>
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---