RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of azgolfer
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:24 PM
> To: Strongtalk-general
> Subject: Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
>
>
>
>
> So, how hard would it be to port SeaSide to Strongtalk ? Seems like
> you wouldn't need the GUI. Also, what kind of scalability/
> multithreading does SeaSide have ?

The issue with Seaside is that it serializes the context stack to model
continuations, which is definitely not what I would call trivially portable
Smalltalk.

-Dave

> On May 10, 5:36 am, "Jim Haungs" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Check out SeaSide.
> >
> > On 5/10/07, azgolfer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > How hard would it be to get something similar to Tomcat up and running
> > > in Strongtalk ? Seems to me that would get ST alot more attention.
> > > Also, what is the PHP vm/interpreter situation. That's another large
> > > audience to go after.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---