RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
"J J" <[email protected]> Sun, 13 May 2007 16:23:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>From: "David Griswold" <[email protected]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ? >Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:48:58 +0200 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of azgolfer > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:24 PM > > To: Strongtalk-general > > Subject: Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ? > > > > So, how hard would it be to port SeaSide to Strongtalk ? Seems like > > you wouldn't need the GUI. Also, what kind of scalability/ > > multithreading does SeaSide have ? > >The issue with Seaside is that it serializes the context stack to model >continuations, which is definitely not what I would call trivially portable >Smalltalk. > >-Dave Can Strongtalk do this? Or support continuations in some other way? Thanks, Jason _________________________________________________________________ Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the im Initiative now. Its free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_MAY07 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---