RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of J J
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 6:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
>
>
>
> >From: "David Griswold" <[email protected]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
> >Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:48:58 +0200
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of azgolfer
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:24 PM
> > > To: Strongtalk-general
> > > Subject: Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
> > >
> > > So, how hard would it be to port SeaSide to Strongtalk ? Seems like
> > > you wouldn't need the GUI. Also, what kind of scalability/
> > > multithreading does SeaSide have ?
> >
> >The issue with Seaside is that it serializes the context stack to model
> >continuations, which is definitely not what I would call
> trivially portable
> >Smalltalk.
> >
> >-Dave
>
> Can Strongtalk do this?  Or support continuations in some other way?

Theoretically, but there is probably an undefined amount of work that would
be required in the VM to get it to work, and no one is working on this.

-Dave


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---