Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?

On May 18, 6:55 am, "J J" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >From: azgolfer <[email protected]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: Strongtalk-general <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
> >Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:17:27 -0700
>
> >I think the main thing is to get something like Tomcat up and running.
>
> And what is it that Tomcat gives that is so important?  Seaside has been one
> of the main drivers in Smalltalk interest over the last couple of years
> afaik.  I'm curious to know what stand-out abilities having a Strongtalk
> tomcat server would give, if any.
My point is an application server would be a great product to drive
Strongtalk popularity, not that we need a Smalltalk version of Tomcat.
I will check out Seaside, after all Strongtalk type performance isn't
necessary for alot of webserver apps.
>
> >I don't think continuations are important at all.
>
> Interesting, just as the rest of the industry is starting to see the power
> and usefulness of them. :)
>From what I've read (which isn't much), it seems like a solution in
search of a problem.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Catch suspicious messages before you open them-with Windows Live Hotmail.http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_m...


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---