Re: Status of Strongtalk C++ code: VM stability and progress on a graphical debugger
Shaping <[email protected]> Wed, 14 May 2008 20:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To everyone who wants something useful to come of Strongtalk: > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Status of Strongtalk C++ code: VM stability and progress on a > graphical debugger > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:06:37 -0700 > > I myself am not working on it right now, primarily because I'm busy > with other things, and because the VM is not multi-threaded and it would > be > very hard to make it so, which limits my interest in it. >If you mean "make it so" as in "make it have the multi-thread model Java >has" then in my opinion it would be a waste of effort to ever do that. Now >what Erlang has would be great and I would expect to be much easier to add >to the VM. Can we discuss this at length and reach a resolve? I want to get into the details, evaluate the choices for a concurrency model, make a small, concrete, realistic plan, and then execute it. Or, I can keep fixing and extending VW, as I have for the last 14 years (not so bad, but not good either). Or, I can cave into Java's readiness for making real, multithreaded apps with good-looking GUIs. Java makes me think of lots of people, doc, examples, help, descent standards--and a language with crappy sytax (and other problems) to clog your read-think path and keep you from your expressive best. >That is lots of information out there as to why the currently popular brand >of "concurrency" is bad and needs to go away. Systems that don't have it >now shouldn't be making huge efforts to add it, but rather just go right >into more advanced stuff. Let's get into it and do something. What is currently wrong with Java's concurrency model? What is Erlang's concurrency model and why is it better? Shaping --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---