Re: Status of Strongtalk C++ code: VM stability and progress on a graphical debugger

Shaping <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2008 02:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > If you want to chase down performance data for Java threads vs. actors,
> > you might look at the actor library in Scala. See
>
> >http://lamp.epfl.ch/~phaller/actors.html
>
> > some of their papers explore this in some detail. The Erlang literature
> > will also give data.
>
> And there's also the Actalk framework that was written in Smalltalk few decades ago.
>
> http://www-poleia.lip6.fr/~briot/actalk/actalk.html


Gilad/Martin, thanks for the links.  I've been reading about Newspeak
and Scala all day, mostly Newspeak, which has a refreshingly simple
grammar.  The nesting of classes, overriding of slots, methods, and
classes, and the late binding for all sends is a powerful
combination.  I think I can achieve the patterns of expression I want
with it.  Brazil and Hopscotch are also inspiring.

Does the current Newspeak in Squeak have a method formatter and syntax
colorizer?

What is the next step in getting Strongtalk into a suitable state for
integration with (or de-Squeaking) Newspeak?

Is the current Strongtalk licensing a problem?


Shaping
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---