Re: Status of Strongtalk C++ code: VM stability and progress on a graphical debugger
Shaping <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2008 02:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > If you want to chase down performance data for Java threads vs. actors, > > you might look at the actor library in Scala. See > > >http://lamp.epfl.ch/~phaller/actors.html > > > some of their papers explore this in some detail. The Erlang literature > > will also give data. > > And there's also the Actalk framework that was written in Smalltalk few decades ago. > > http://www-poleia.lip6.fr/~briot/actalk/actalk.html Gilad/Martin, thanks for the links. I've been reading about Newspeak and Scala all day, mostly Newspeak, which has a refreshingly simple grammar. The nesting of classes, overriding of slots, methods, and classes, and the late binding for all sends is a powerful combination. I think I can achieve the patterns of expression I want with it. Brazil and Hopscotch are also inspiring. Does the current Newspeak in Squeak have a method formatter and syntax colorizer? What is the next step in getting Strongtalk into a suitable state for integration with (or de-Squeaking) Newspeak? Is the current Strongtalk licensing a problem? Shaping --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---