Re: Status of Strongtalk C++ code: VM stability and progress on a graphical debugger
"Gilad Bracha" <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2008 19:28:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Shaping <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The other place it is > > used is in the deserializer, which is pretty central to our take on > > deployment. > > But we do need it for serializing instances and source code? We use become: or deserializing objects in NOF (Newspeak Object Format). Again, it could be done otherwise, but its a lot easier this way. > > > > > > A correct implementation of doesNotUnderstand: is necessary as well. > I > > > > understand some people on the list are looking at these issues. > > > > > What's wrong with Strongtalk's #doesNotUnderstand:? > > > > It doesn't seem to get called if you override it. > > So, Strongtalk's polymorphism breaks on #doesNotUnderstand:, but not > in general (seems to be working everywhere else in the image?). talksmall explained the mechanics in detail. Bottom line. It does not work as expected. > > > -- Cheers, Gilad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---