Re: OSX port
talksmall <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <68b36a7d-6cb7-4b78-9f89-30f2e2d3e620@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com> |
Hi Gilad, On Aug 10, 3:31=A0am, Gilad Bracha <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome. Do you have Aliens working on Strongtalk yet? It's a very small > step from Aliens to ObjectiveCAliens - at which point a GUI is in reach, = I > think. > I haven't started on Aliens yet, but it is next on my list. I have started looking at the documentation from the NS Aliens work. My instinct is to re-use as much of the NS Aliens code as possible. One concern I have with that approach is that my understanding is that the NewSpeak code, including presumably the Aliens code, is licensed by Cadence under an Apache license, whereas contributions to Strongtalk are licensed under a BSD license. One approach to this is to keep the Aliens code separate from the Strongtalk base and load it into the image as a separate step, however that is not very convenient, particularly if we were to depend upon an ObjectCAlien to enable an OSX UI. Do you think Cadence would be prepared to dual license the Aliens code under BSD and Apache? The alternative is to re-implement Aliens from scratch as per the specs from the documentation. It's more work, but it would be license clean. -talksmall --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to strongtalk-general+unsubscrib= [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strong= talk-general?hl=3Den -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---