Re: Digital Twin applied to Software
Colin Sare-Soar <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:09:07 +0700 (ICT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.vwnc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This all sounds rather complicated for what would be achieved in the end. It isn't Smalltalk and therefore a bit out of the scope of this board but I thought I should mention Pyside6 in respect of prototyping in an interpreted language (Python) and running with C++ libraries (Qt) accessed from within Python code. Maybe something similar could be done with SmallTalk which seems to be what you are suggesting in your final paragraph. > On 08/11/2022 13:59 +07 andre <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As said, there is no formal mapping. > > One could enforce a common denominator (design patterns) at both ends, like shared pointers for all objects, only virtual methods at the C++ end and strong typing at the Smalltalk end. In reality it get's a lot more complex than that (need for class-side virtual methods, reflection). > > That would rob each side of its unique advantages. You would get something a C++ compiler can compile, but not C++. Not much would be left of the performance gain. > > The new Smalltalk compiler would have to deal with strong typing and the exceptions and dependency management it implies. It'd be a new language. > > Porting Smalltalk to C++ involves a lot of deep thought and manual work that can be assisted by tools only to some extent. Porting C++ to Smalltalk is even more daunting (almost impossible, I would say) except for simple classes and domains. > > Another approach is to embedd a Smalltalk interpreter or VM into a C++ application. That way you get a solid foundation with dynamic extensibility. Should work fine for CAD. > > Andre > > -- > > > On 7. Nov 2022, at 03:57, Aik-Siong Koh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Andre: > > > > You understand my Digital Twin idea perfectly. Your statement sums it all: > > "The ideal case for using both languages together might be to explore uncharted terrain with Smalltalk and port to C++ after a sound architecture has settled." > > > > Anyone doing this systematically? How to promote Digital Twin? How to turn this Smalltalk advantage into a business? > > > > I am applying idea to Pharo and OpenCascade to create Digital Twins of CAD software. Any feedback or interest would be greatly appreciated. > > > > All the best, > > Aik-Siong > >