Re: [Pharo-users] Block evaluation with n+1 arguments
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.vwnc,gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.pharo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BTW to me when a block needs too many arguments it feels like that an object has to be born :) With an object I can just sent or not a given extra argument. Now I do not know enough your specific context but what I learned is that complex blocks are difficult to follow, manipulate… so I keep block as simple as possible and else I create little objects. This is a little lectures from a super cool forthcoming mooc https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://rmod-files.lille.inria.fr/DesignCoffeeClub/ForLearningLab/7-Lang-04-BlocksVsObjects.pdf__;!!DZ3fjg!7bRnSLpPY1OiW_EoNtvSDBVMfYN5owvLQjTs_FdNbynPLMw7hmdZCNifkawlO9Hz-NbVkGnnh37u3XIaEJEAHjFBHHppJxSeBgY$ > On 6 Apr 2023, at 15:28, Steffen Märcker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I want to evaluate a block an argument 'arg1' and additional n arguments > given in an array 'args'. The following code does the trick: > > block valueWithArguments: (Array with: arg1) , args. > > Is there a way to do this without the overhead of creating a new Array? > (How) Can I add additional #value:value:[...] methods to BlockClosure that > evaluate the block with n arguments directly without falling back to > #valueWithArguments: ? If yes, what's the maximum? > > Cheers! > Steffen