Re: [Pharo-users] Block evaluation with n+1 arguments
Steffen Märcker <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:04:44 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.vwnc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1681229036072.2112543148.4106636135__18325.7876009279$1681229149$gmane$org@web.de> |
Hi Stephane, thanks for linking the upcoming lesson. I'll have a look. :-D Best, Steffen [email protected] schrieb am Montag, 10. April 2023 16:03:16 (+02:00): BTW to me when a block needs too many arguments it feels like that an object has to be born :) With an object I can just sent or not a given extra argument. Now I do not know enough your specific context but what I learned is that complex blocks are difficult to follow, manipulate… so I keep block as simple as possible and else I create little objects. This is a little lectures from a super cool forthcoming mooc https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://rmod-files.lille.inria.fr/DesignCoffeeClub/ForLearningLab/7-Lang-04-BlocksVsObjects.pdf__;!!DZ3fjg!4hxGplUo80yWQfoAaMK97NrfdKHnuY2pfPJbwIcnAkdIxsM-tPvc6Hu8a3iu02EkC8kvX0QloKrxQ7CiCZ2ZAiE$ On 6 Apr 2023, at 15:28, Steffen Märcker <[email protected]> wrote: Hi! I want to evaluate a block an argument 'arg1' and additional n arguments given in an array 'args'. The following code does the trick: block valueWithArguments: (Array with: arg1) , args. Is there a way to do this without the overhead of creating a new Array? (How) Can I add additional #value:value:[...] methods to BlockClosure that evaluate the block with n arguments directly without falling back to #valueWithArguments: ? If yes, what's the maximum? Cheers! Steffen -- Gesendet mit Vivaldi Mail. Laden Sie Vivaldi kostenlos von vivaldi.com herunter.