Re: Deviation from Basis spec for Posix.TTY.TC.getattr?
John Reppy <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:27:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.sml.smlnj |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for pointing this out. We'll correct it for 110.63. - John On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:53 PM, Adam Chlipala wrote: > The specification at: > http://www.standardml.org/Basis/posix-tty.html > mentions a value Posix.TTY.TC.getattr. However, that value seems > to be > included as Posix.TTY.getattr instead in SML/NJ 110.60. Likewise for > setattr. > > Should the implementation match the spec on that web site? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Smlnj-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smlnj-list > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV