Re: semantics of isolate
Dave Herman <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:08:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.sml.smlnj |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I haven't heard a response from anyone... if someone knows how `isolate' works I don't think it should be too hard of a question. Thanks again, Dave Dave Herman wrote: > Can someone help clarify SMLofNJ.Cont.isolate for me? IIUC, the > semantics of isolate is something along the lines of: > > v ::= ... | cont(E') (* captured continuation *) > > E[isolate \x.e] ---> E[cont(E')] > where E' = e[x := []] > > and the semantics of throw is roughly: > > E[throw cont(E') v] ---> E'[v] > > So effectively, `throw (isolate \().e) ()' should be equivalent to > `abort e', where > > E[abort e] ---> e > > Yes? > > Thanks, > Dave > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Smlnj-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smlnj-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV