Re: Tclkit vs Tclkit Lite VFS performance

"Pat Thoyts" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.tcl.starkit
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quickly following up my own post -- I noticed I used tclkitsh85a4 so I
re-ran with 85a6 and lost the stacktrace. Still bad timing though.

C:\opt\tcl\src\kitbench>tclkitsh vfsperf.tcl
kitten C:/opt/tcl/src/kitbench/kitten.kit
sdx C:/opt/tcl/src/kitbench/sdx.kit
tclkit 8.5a6 : C:/opt/tcl/src/kitbench/tclkitsh85.exe
  lite 8.5a6 : C:/opt/tcl/src/kitbench/tclkit-cli85.exe

tclkit {} : 26900.0
  lite {} : 36428.8
tclkit pkgreq : 32743.9
  lite pkgreq : 153235.6

tclkit stat : 169.696
  lite stat : 3802.087
tclkit mtime : 154.386
  lite mtime : 3809.504
tclkit glob : 1894.2
  lite glob : 37238.33
tclkit open : 162.3
  lite open : 4050.65
tclkit read : 335.91
  lite read : 3878.43
tclkit read-large : 4264.76
  lite read-large : 8575.66
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.