[Issue 6437] New - concurrency: unspecified
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.uml.argouml.issues |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6437
Issue #|6437
Summary|concurrency: unspecified
Component|argouml
Version|0.34
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|All
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|ENHANCEMENT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|Model
Assigned to|bobtarling
Reported by|yurikhan
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Mon Jul 16 23:24:38 -0700 2012 -------
Currently, ArgoUML insists that each and every class operation state its
concurrency — sequential, guarded or concurrent, and displays it as a property
string (e.g. foo() {sequential}). This unnecessarily clutters the diagram if
property strings are displayed; if I hide them, I lose important information in
other properties (e.g. {query}).
I suggest that it should be possible to suppress the display of concurrency
independently of the master property switch.
OMG UML 1.5 says:
> In the absence of a specification, the concurrency semantics are unspecified
and must therefore be assumed to be sequential in the worst case.
i.e. they explicitly allow the case of unspecified concurrency.
------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=448&dsMessageId=2990914
To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail: [[email protected]].
Please do not reply to this mail. Instead, add your comments in the issue.