[Issue 6437] New - concurrency: unspecified

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.uml.argouml.issues
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6437
                 Issue #|6437
                 Summary|concurrency: unspecified
               Component|argouml
                 Version|0.34
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|ENHANCEMENT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|Model
             Assigned to|bobtarling
             Reported by|yurikhan






------- Additional comments from [email protected] Mon Jul 16 23:24:38 -0700 2012 -------
Currently, ArgoUML insists that each and every class operation state its
concurrency — sequential, guarded or concurrent, and displays it as a property
string (e.g. foo() {sequential}). This unnecessarily clutters the diagram if
property strings are displayed; if I hide them, I lose important information in
other properties (e.g. {query}).

I suggest that it should be possible to suppress the display of concurrency
independently of the master property switch.

OMG UML 1.5 says:

> In the absence of a specification, the concurrency semantics are unspecified
and must therefore be assumed to be sequential in the worst case.

i.e. they explicitly allow the case of unspecified concurrency.

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=448&dsMessageId=2990914

To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail: [[email protected]].
Please do not reply to this mail. Instead, add your comments in the issue.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.