Re: Strange Advice From Critics
"Mark Fortner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.uml.argouml.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michiel, Thanks. I entered the issue into bugzilla (# 4728). Regards, Mark On 4/19/07, Michiel van der Wulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > You are not missing something, but ArgoUML is. > Indeed, the association between the actor and the "Zoom" usecase should > suffice for the critic NOT to trigger. > > Please enter an issue for this case in our database - this issue is > unknown yet. > See: http://argouml.tigris.org/project_bugs.html > > Regards, > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mark Fortner <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:29 PM > *Subject:* [argouml-users] Strange Advice From Critics > > I've been trying to use the critics as a way of insuring that my model is > complete. However, when creating use case diagrams I've noticed that the > critics often provide me with feedback that doesn't make sense. > > For example, let's say you want to create the following use-cases > > Actor -- (Zooming) --> (Zoom Into Rectangular Selection) > --> (Zoom In By Increment) > --> (Zoom Out By Increment) > > To create the first generalization of Zooming (Zoom Into Rectangular > Selection), I click the Zooming use-case and drag the generalization arrow > at the top of the use-case. When I release the mouse, the new use case is > created, and I enter it's name directly into the use-case ellipse. > > However, when I do this I get feedback telling me that I need to "Add > Associations" to the usecase even though in my estimation I just created the > association that I wanted. > > Am I missing something? > > Regards, > > Mark > > ------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.4/768 - Release Date: 19/04/2007 > 5:32 > >