RE: association between classes in diferent packages

Here's the issue link

http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4808

Hope it's clear enough.

Javier

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 08:48 -0400, Javier Adorno wrote:
> OK, I'll file a bug report.
> 
> Thanks for your support.
> 
> Javier
> 
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 03:01 -0400, Tom Morris wrote:
> > OK, the screen capture makes it clearer what you are trying to do.  I didn't
> > understand that you were making an association between classes which were in
> > two different packages.  That wasn't the case I tested.
> > 
> > The association is being put in the closest common namespace (package in
> > this case).  I thought that the rules would be less strict for non-navigable
> > association ends, but I don't see the behavior changing in this case.  I'd
> > need to double check the well formedness rules in the UML 1.4 spec, but I
> > suspect they are what's driving this behavior.  Or it could just be a
> > misintepretation of those rules...
> > 
> > Why don't you file a bug report so that it doesn't fall through the cracks?
> > I'm not 100% sure what the correct behavior is off the top of my head and
> > don't have time to check right now.
> > 
> > Tom
> >