Re: Sequence vs Sequence2

Hi Mark,

the UI never offered the choice between the two seq diagram implementations=
. Sequence2 is active for several releases now. The old implementation was =
kept only for old projects so they still load. I think there is no conversi=
on functionality, old seq diagram will keep using the old implementation.

Maybe we should clean issuezilla from all seq diagram issues that refer to =
the old implementation. A "WONTFIX" with mentioning the new implementation =
would be suitable. Any User can do this by testing if the issue is still fo=
r newly created seq diagrams.

Just my opinion.

Regards,
Thomas

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:39:54 +0000
> Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [argouml-users] Sequence vs Sequence2

> Hi Mark
>=20
> This is more relevant to the dev list than users I think.
>=20
> Regards
>=20
> Bob
>=20
> On 14 March 2011 16:40, Mark Fortner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was working on a Sequence diagram recently and noticed a number of
> > problems with it. =C2=A0There seem to be a number of outstanding issues=
 in
> > Bugzilla for it. =C2=A0I also noticed that we have a Sequence2
> implementation,
> > and I was wondering which diagram type should I be using? =C2=A0What ar=
e the
> > plans for transitioning to the new Sequence diagram?
> > Regards,
> > Mark
>=20
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3D449&dsMessageId=
=3D2711459
>=20
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [[email protected]].

--=20
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!=09=09=09
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3D449&dsMessageId=3D2=
711462

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]=
ris.org].