Re: Is Mozilla XUL just a Firefox "add-on"? Is Mozilla XUL relevant at all?
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.xul.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Vexi.org - Veni Vidi Vici |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 06:18 -0700, Gerald Bauer wrote: > What's your take on it? Do you agree that Mozilla's > XUL is just a Firefox "add-on" and not relevant in any > way as long as its bound to the Mozilla machinery? > What's your take on the "pure" XUL runtime? Why hasn't > Mozilla released anything so far? Mozilla suffers from the same problem as XAML, that it ties you into a particular environment that must be premeditated. You cannot visit an XUL app and have Mozilla automatically pre-install itself, which makes it more of an Intranet / internal-company application platform than a rich UI alternative to HMTL forms. -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Online @ www.charlietech.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click