Re: Is HTML a free-for-all? WHAT WG spokesman says W3C doesn't care about HTML
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.xul.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 08:22 -0700, Gerald Bauer wrote: > PS: Here's Jim's follow up: > > I am disgusted, and I am disgusted with Opera, Apples > and Mozilla involvement in this deliberate subversion > of internet standards, whilst namespaces were perhaps > not the best idea in the first place, we have them > now, and we should ensure that they work. > ... > I expected a much better argument from the WHATWG to > have been agreed on, than "we don't care much about > internet standards". Can't but agree with that. WHATNG should look out for the best interests of everybody and not just themselves. Adhering to existing web standards is a key part of keeping the Internet a sane environment for both developers and users. Hasn't Microsoft done enough damage already? Are WHATNG just trying to add another prong to the Devil's fork? Why not just use another namespace? 'HTMLNG'? -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Online @ www.charlietech.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND