Re: Re: [xul-announce] GTK# Fails The XAML Test
Marc Clifton <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:51:14 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.xul.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Arron, Thanks for the great advice! Marc Arron Ferguson wrote: > > > >Marc, > >KDE >--- >For KDE there is an XML API for marshalling/unmarshalling XML. The XML >API is in the _KDE_ API found at: > >http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/xmlgui.html > > >It is very primitive, but it is a start. > > >For Mac, there's a very primitive feature to describe properties: >http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-matters34.html > >Based on a DTD, so no XML Schema and no namespaces. Like I say, >primitive. > > >And a whole wack of links to specifications (includes XAML & XUL): > >http://xml.coverpages.org/userInterfaceXML.html > > >Marc, as far as trying to create some sort of consortium, I would say >that that would be about as easy as trying to hurd a pile of snakes. >The whole lot is going off in so many different directions. I would >recommend simply selecting one or two APIs that you see as being >worthy (long-term, popular, scalable, etc.) and just go with them. The >reason why I say this is because the whole XML-UI thing has exploded >and everyone and their dog has created one. You'll probably go crazy >trying to round them up. > >If it were my bet to make, I would say that for the Unix/Linux world >the Gtk thing will probably be the one to fly (vs. KDE). My reasoning >is because of: >a) the licensing with it is not as messy as the KDE/Qt problem; >b) Gtk has gone a teeny weeny farther with the XML business and; >c) Sun has made noise of switching over to it. > >You might as well look into finding ways to make the Gtk thing work. > >my .02 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Got any contacts of people/groups involved in this? I'd really like to >see that happen, and I've even been considering the idea of creating >some sort of a consortium or something that promotes this kind of >xaml-ification of toolkits. Having worked (or my customer having >worked) with big hitters like DevExpress and Infragistics, there's a >wide spectrum of toolkits that need to be brought up to par for >declarative programming happiness to be achieved. > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media >100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 >Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. >http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 >_______________________________________________ >xul-talk mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285