Re: Re: [xul-announce] GTK# Fails The XAML Test

Marc Clifton <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:51:14 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.xul.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Arron,

Thanks for the great advice!

Marc

Arron Ferguson wrote:

>
>
>
>Marc,
>
>KDE
>---
>For KDE there is an XML API for marshalling/unmarshalling XML. The XML
>API is in the _KDE_ API found at:
>
>http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/xmlgui.html
>
>
>It is very primitive, but it is a start.
>
>
>For Mac, there's a very primitive feature to describe properties:
>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-matters34.html
>
>Based on a DTD, so no XML Schema and no namespaces. Like I say,
>primitive.
>
>
>And a whole wack of links to specifications (includes XAML & XUL):
>
>http://xml.coverpages.org/userInterfaceXML.html
>
>
>Marc, as far as trying to create some sort of consortium, I would say
>that that would be about as easy as trying to hurd a pile of snakes.
>The whole lot is going off in so many different directions. I would
>recommend simply selecting one or two APIs that you see as being
>worthy (long-term, popular, scalable, etc.) and just go with them. The
>reason why I say this is because the whole XML-UI thing has exploded
>and everyone and their dog has created one. You'll probably go crazy
>trying to round them up.
>
>If it were my bet to make, I would say that for the Unix/Linux world
>the Gtk thing will probably be the one to fly (vs. KDE). My reasoning
>is because of:
>a) the licensing with it is not as messy as the KDE/Qt problem;
>b) Gtk has gone a teeny weeny farther with the XML business and;
>c) Sun has made noise of switching over to it.
>
>You might as well look into finding ways to make the Gtk thing work.
>
>my .02
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Got any contacts of people/groups involved in this?  I'd really like to
>see that happen, and I've even been considering the idea of creating
>some sort of a consortium or something that promotes this kind of
>xaml-ification of toolkits.  Having worked (or my customer having
>worked) with big hitters like DevExpress and Infragistics, there's a
>wide spectrum of toolkits that need to be brought up to par for
>declarative programming happiness to be achieved.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>_______________________________________________
>xul-talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
>
>
>  
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285