Re: XUL or not XUL
Matthew Raymond <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:05:49 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.xul.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arron Ferguson wrote:
> XUL is a technology, not a brand name.
It's both. Companies trademark the names of their technologies all
the time.
> XUI is a technology (the same
> type of technology as a XUL) not a brand name.
I'm not sure the software vendor Xoetrope, who lists XUI as one of
its "products", would agree with you.
> Gerald is right in
> calling it XUL. Mozilla cannot claim XUL as a brand name since it is an
> acronym that represents a technology, not a brand name.
Mozilla originated the term, they claim it as a copyright, and
members of the Mozilla Foundation have attempted to discourage its use
as a generic term. What else can they do other than haul people into court?
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt