Re: Wim's Conf Proposal

On 16 Feb 2005 at 0:34, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote:

> alex black wrote:
> >> Ok. In case the conf_value is an array, 'value' would give you a var_dump
> >> or so; 'get' would give the (multilevel) array.
> > 
> > 
> > Ah - I think its unnecessary? What do others think?
> 
> How can we store an array as conf value using sql?

That's solved. An array is serialised or var_dumped or whatever is fast.
In the db that is.

> We used to retrieve a section to get an array of its values.

Still stands. Conf does that on the fly.
In fact I'll implement to cache a domain in full.
Let's benchmark that !

Cheers,
wim niemans


> 
> -- 
> Jean-Christophe Michel
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe-zNu2Yekbks92Brm55YPRC3dfcadvtA/[email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help-zNu2Yekbks92Brm55YPRC3dfcadvtA/[email protected]
> 
>