Re: Re: [issues] [binarycloud] #107: properties without a name in conf.xml

On 25 Feb 2005 at 13:23, alex black wrote:

> see my comment:
> 
> Why is this bad?
> 
> It results in clean arrays without keys when converted to PHP.
> 
> This is actually an excellent argument against moving to a database for  
> conf (only) - because you don't necessarily want to have to reference  
> each individual property with a key - sometimes you want an array.
> 

Dear Alex,

I am new to binarycloud and I do experience troubles to get used to the 
custom on the discussion list: I take any post seriously.
Now, people say that a path must be unique; people say that having arrays 
in the conf_value in the database is a bad idea (I removed the type 
'object' from the proposal already).
So I created a ticket in response to the post that acknowledges the error 
in xml. What can I say?

wim niemans

<snipped>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev