Re: drop singletons in favor of static calls

why?

I like jcm's suggestion a lot :)

_a




> Jean-Christophe Michel schrieb:
>> Hi,
>> Why not keep singletons hidden and use static calls ?
>> Instead of doing
>> $o =& Singleton::getInstance();
>> $o->action();
>> we would do
>> SIngleton::action();
>> and action would in turn do
>>   $o =& Singleton::getInstance();
>> if it's not completely static.
>> Would spare one line on each call without loosing any feature.
>> Could be applied to Conf, Timer, Project...
>
> This is only a matter of taste and I like Singletons better.
>
>
> Manuel
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
> http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>

-- 
alex black, founder
the turing studio, inc.

510.666.0074
[email protected]
http://www.turingstudio.com

2600 10th street, suite 635
berkeley, ca 94710


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev