Re: PEAR i18n package

> without iconv (or mbstring but he chose iconv).

iconv is more "well known"

> I don't know how available iconv is (the author of PEAR's I18Nv2 
> package said it was generally available since its functioanlity is 
> part of most system's libc) so the question is:
>
> Should we use PEAR::I18Nv2? I think we should since the code is tested 
> and works. No need to reinvent the wheel.

Yes, with caveats -

I want the I18N features to complain if iconv isn't installed, but not 
break the system - and installing binarycloud for sites that do not 
require I18N _should_not_ require iconv.

_a

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev