Re: Re: an outsiders view

Hi WIm,

Wim Niemans a =E9crit :
...

You have many good ideas.

> It's a pity that some key people fled the team with priorities that do
> not match the key-purpose of the framework.
> To me, personally, their reasons to abandon BC have to do with fatigue
> and the need for quick results.=20

Sure, as usual in OS projects, fatigue of being to few to work: having a
responsive community is essential to survive.
But it's a deception with php evolution in php5 and its OO level too.

> Off course, their new home is trendy,
> exciting and thrilling. However, the innovating thinking was already
> done at Rails.

Sure, I innove a bit less but I can work faster ;p
I was an ardent fan of the node tree hierarchy as opposed to MVC.
Though I must say that MVC implemented like this is very efficient.
Not due to the MVC itself, but more to the very good language (ruby) and
to the good ideas (generators, ActiveRecord taking confs from db without
description files...).

> FYI: My very personal feeling is that Rails compares to professional
> frameworks as DBASEIV does to Oracle. A matter of taste.

Ah. Php as professional language doesn't seem very convincing to me.
But such considerations are more troll like than real discussions ;-)
So i won't continue.

Good luck with the changes you proposed, seems very attractive.

--=20
Jean-Christophe Michel
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev