Re: [doc] b2 headers

Mateusz Loskot via Boost-build <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.build
Message-ID <CABUeae-D+rCdCpe7G3QYJcfiFZjyrFTGUyr=pp0oFUhE3RU0iw@mail.gmail.com>
On 9 April 2018 at 19:27, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 07:35 AM, Mateusz Loskot via Boost-build wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking for documentation about purpose of command
>>
>> b2 headers
>>
>> Greping for headers or modular inside  /tools/build/doc and
>> /doc gives me nothing, so I blindly assume the unsearchable
>> https://www.boost.org/build/ does not explain it either.
>>
>> The magic of https://www.google.com/search?q="b2+headers"
>> brought this page to my attention:
>> https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/tools/boostdep/doc/html/
>> where, to my surprise, I find one of best intro to the concept
>> of modular Boost including very helpful explanation of the virtual
>> /boost directory and role of b2 headers command.
>>
>> Why this kind of information is presented in docs for somewhat
>> exotic to Boost (end)users command, I have no idea.
>
>   `b2 headers` is not really intended for end users.
> It's only relevant when working from git as the
> packaged releases have all the headers moved into
> boost/ to begin with.

I should have said, an advanced power end-user with potential for
Boost contributor :)

>  As a result, the obvious
> places to put this documentation (the getting started
> guide and `b2 --help` from $BOOST_ROOT) are not really
> correct.
>
>   b2 headers is discussed briefly here:
> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Getting-Started
> which is about as good a location as anywhere.


AFAIC count, that makes 3 if not 4 places to learn about Boost and
non-Boost-specific  features of Boost.Build

IMHO, use of GitHub wiki for such important documentation should be simply
forbidden, for sake of decreasing docs dispersal.

>   Also, most of the time, you don't need to care
> about `b2 headers`.  Running b2 in $BOOST_ROOT
> will build the headers in addition to putting
> the libraries in stage/lib.  For internal use
> such as Boost tests and examples, the necessary
> headers will be created automatically.

I disagree. Most of the time, as a contributor to Boost.X,
I don't care about all the Boost libraries but X.
So, I'm indeed interested in building as little as possible:

b2 headers
cd libs/x
b2 test

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.