Re: Fwd: [C++-sig] bjam invocation error "rule copyright unknown in module man"
Larry Evans via Boost-build <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Feb 2019 21:58:07 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/2/19 8:12 PM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build wrote: > AMDG > > On 2/2/19 7:03 PM, Larry Evans via Boost-build wrote: >> On 2/2/19 7:52 PM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build wrote: >>> On 2/2/19 6:42 PM, Larry Evans via Boost-build wrote: >>>> <snip> >>>> So, I'd guess I'm using an old b2; however, I just did the install as >>>> instructed here: >>>> >>>> https://boostorg.github.io/build/manual/develop/index.html#bbv2.installation >>>> >>>> and provided a symlink to the b2 executable: >>>> >>>> evansl@lje-DL:~/bin$ ln -s >>>> /home/evansl/prog_dev/boost/releases/ro/boost_1_69_0/tools/build/bin/bin/b2 >>>> > > bin/bin looks a little odd. Are you sure that's right? > Yes. It's odd buts that's because, following the #bbv2.installation instructions, I did, in the build directory: ./b2 --install=PREFIX where PREFIX was bin. Apparently --install creates another bin directory below PREFIX. >>>> >>>> <snip> >> After more investigating, I see in scan.c, that there is >> code to actually skip the block comment, but if so, then why >> is the b2 *not* skipping the block comments in types/xml.jam and >> types/sass-type.xml >> >> There must be some minor mistake I'm making but it's not obvious yet :( >> > > Did you verify that you are actually using the newly built b2? Well, the output of the bash `which` command indicated I was, but the output of `command -v b2` says it's the system installed one in /usr/bin. Sorry for not being careful enough :( Thanks for your help. > > In Christ, > Steven Watanabe > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build