Re: Including bjam code based on the address_model

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:46 AM Edward Diener via Boost-build <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I do understand that the logic for 32-bit versus 64-bit setup may
> already be in a toolset's jamfile, but this is not guaranteed for every
> toolset. Even when it is in the toolset's jamfile it is rarely documented.


Let's reset a bit.. Since it's the intel-win toolset you're mucking with
lets make it support the toolset requirements directly first. And then we
can find a way to support that use case. Supporting the requirements is as
easy as:

* Adding the extra "requirement *" argument to the init. Ex: <
https://github.com/boostorg/build/blob/develop/src/tools/gcc.jam#L151>
* Passing that to "check-init-parameters". Ex: <
https://github.com/boostorg/build/blob/develop/src/tools/gcc.jam#L278>

From there one can optionally add custom handling of default requirements.
For example a default target-os: <
https://github.com/boostorg/build/blob/develop/src/tools/gcc.jam#L284>

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build