Re: Debugging curious problem with clang-win toolset

On 8/18/2019 8:14 AM, Steven Watanabe via Boost-build wrote:
> AMDG
> 
> On 8/17/19 10:40 PM, Edward Diener via Boost-build wrote:
>> I am trying to debug a curious problem with clang-win toolsets. I have
>> toolsets for a number of different versions of clang on Windows,
>> installed to different directories. All were working properly under
>> Boost Build, thanks to Peter Dimov's changes to get clang-win to work.
>> Recently I downloaded llvm-7.1, with its clang-7.1 implementation to
>> test. When I tried testing it, running b2 with the -d2 option, I saw
>> that the command to compile source was not being generated for the
>> command line.
>> <snip>
>>
>> When I added, in my local
>> copy, echoing to get the final results for clang-win.init for setting up
>> the tools, I get for 7.1 and 7.0, for 64-bit compilation:
>>
>> notice: [clang-win] using compiler
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin71.bat"', version '7.1'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: using condition
>> '<toolset>clang-win-7.1/<architecture>/<address-model>64' using
>> condition '<toolset>clang-win-7.1/<architecture>x86/<address-model>64'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .CC
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin71.bat" -m64'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.link .LD
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin71.bat" -m64 /link /incremental:no
>> /manifest'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .ASM
>> 'E:/programming/bat/as64_clangwin71.bat -nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.archive .LD
>> 'E:/programming/bat/ar64_clangwin71.bat /nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.link .MT
>> 'E:/programming/bat/mt64_clangwin71.bat -nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .MC 'mc.exe'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .RC 'rc.exe /nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .IDL 'midl.exe'
>>
>> notice: [clang-win] using compiler
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin70.bat"', version '7.0'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: using condition
>> '<toolset>clang-win-7.0/<architecture>/<address-model>64' using
>> condition '<toolset>clang-win-7.0/<architecture>x86/<address-model>64'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .CC
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin70.bat" -m64'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.link .LD
>> '"E:/programming/bat/cp64_clangwin70.bat" -m64 /link /incremental:no
>> /manifest'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .ASM
>> 'E:/programming/bat/as64_clangwin70.bat -nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.archive .LD
>> 'E:/programming/bat/ar64_clangwin70.bat /nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.link .MT
>> 'E:/programming/bat/mt64_clangwin70.bat -nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .MC 'mc.exe'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .RC 'rc.exe /nologo'
>> notice: [clang-win] 64: clang-win.compile .IDL 'midl.exe'
>>
>> In other words the clang-win.init shows everything being set up properly
>> for both toolsets, but the compilation for 7.1 failing because the
>> command is never issued properly.
>>
> 
> Does it make a difference if clang-7.1 is the only version
> of clang defined?

No. Same problem occurs if I have only the clang-win-7.1 toolset 
definition in my user-config.jam and no other clang-win-x.x toolset 
definition there.

> 
>> How can I debug this ? I do know and love the Boost Build debugger but I
>> have no idea where I should set a debugger breakpoint in the Boost Build
>> source to see where this failure is occurring.
>>
> 
> Try toolset.set-target-variables-aux

Thanks, I will look at that in the debugger.

> 
>> All other toolsets outside 7.1 are working properly. I have clang
>> toolsets from 3.9 to 8.0 I can test and the rest are working just fine
>> with the compiler command being generated properly from the
>> clang-win.init results. I have a terrible suspicion this bug may have to
>> do with the changes to Boost Build run parallel threads for each
>> processor core ( I have 4 ), but I hope this is not the case.
> 
> Unlikely.  Boost.Build has supported parallel builds from day 1.
> The change was only to adjust the default number of threads.
> 
>> Still it
>> is baffling that this one clang-win toolset fails to generate the
>> compilation command  even though the results from clang-win.init show it
>> is being setup properly, and all others succeed.
>>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build