Re: Capy: Request for endorsements
Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-02-17 20:52, Seth via Boost wrote: > ... > The problem arises as soon copyrighted material is used during > training. Yes, it does lead to interesting grey areas, after all > humans do similar aggregation in practice. However, there's a very big > difference in effort and implied merit involved. > > To be frank an optimistic (?!) statement like "no new legislation > required" seems to fly in the face of public opinion and common sense. > ... > I am not a lawyer, but infringement is a real problem, with software, hardware as well as AI models. For IBM Granite models https://www.ibm.com/granite from "Read the IBM statement on IP protection" section near bottom of page: "... Moreover, contrary to some other providers of large language models and consistent with the IBM standard approach on indemnification, IBM does not require its customers to indemnify IBM for a customer's use of IBM-developed models. Also, consistent with the IBM approach to its indemnification obligation, IBM does not cap its indemnification liability for the IBM-developed models. ..." I don't know of any other AI model provider that provides a copyright indemnity for its models. If a third party sues you claiming that an IBM-developed AI model or its output infringes on their copyright, IBM will step in to defend you and cover the legal costs. Disclaimer: While I just finished my first semester as Student of Mathematics at age of 60 in early retirement, I am still IBM employee until age of 63. Regards, Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UTGIQRU3E7PBHHKXGYXM5NKSKAZNSWUL/