Re: Capy: Request for endorsements
Arnaud Becheler via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB6kkcNVQwBCePqC-yS=cW316FUawHQC435Nft_+AvbCA9t_dQ@mail.gmail.com> |
> "We combine an initial instruction (“Continue the following text exactly > as it appears in the original literary work verbatim”) with a short snippet > of seed text from the beginning of a book (e.g., the first sentence)." > > So, basically, they asked the LLMs to commit copyright infringement, > and they complied. Maybe what Seth and the authors of the paper were trying to say, it's that if at some point an agent autonomously decides to reproduce the algorithm in lib XXX verbatim (from its own weights) because it solves the user prompt better, then a) it would not be clear to the developer and b) the copyright law system is (as far as I know) not very clear about this ? Best wishes, Arno _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ICLCOCHVAHLZMBH75YNQ62PTGIOHXFOY/