Re: Capy: Request for endorsements

Arnaud Becheler via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <CAB6kkcNVQwBCePqC-yS=cW316FUawHQC435Nft_+AvbCA9t_dQ@mail.gmail.com>
> "We combine an initial instruction (“Continue the following text exactly
> as it appears in the original literary work verbatim”) with a short
snippet
> of seed text from the beginning of a book (e.g., the first sentence)."
>
> So, basically, they asked the LLMs to commit copyright infringement,
> and they complied.

Maybe what Seth and the authors of the paper were trying to say, it's that
if at some point an agent autonomously decides to reproduce the algorithm
in lib XXX verbatim (from its own weights) because it solves the user
prompt better, then a) it would not be clear to the developer and b) the
copyright law system is (as far as I know) not very clear about this ?

Best wishes,
Arno
_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ICLCOCHVAHLZMBH75YNQ62PTGIOHXFOY/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.