Re: Capy: Request for endorsements

Peter Dimov via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Julien Blanc wrote:
> Le 2026-02-20 15:09, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
> 
> > It can't be correct, because if it were, you wouldn't be able to
> > produce a non- infringing work either, if you have ever been exposed
> > to a copyrighted one; the exposure has altered your mental state, so
> > your output is tainted by definition.
> 
> IIRC, some employers are forbidding their engineers to look at their
> competitors' patents for this exact reason : they don't want to be accused of
> some sort of plagiarism / patent infrigement if their engineers come to a
> solution that is too close from the patented one.

Yes. This by the way doesn't work. It's only a defense against willful
infringement (which carries triple damages) and not against infringement in
general.

That's why I said that preemptively forbidding things is almost always
counterproductive.


_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/X46QQ2CALSYICUU5A42Z2LQWMSRUW74F/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.