Re: Proposing statsort for Boost.Sort

Peter Taraba via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <trinity-f259a96b-d2a5-4546-8c03-7e5c7d1ff553-1773512284765@3c-app-mailcom-lxa12>
> Wouldn't it make sense to run benchmarks against the other functions in Boost.Sort first?

yes Marc, thank you for amazing feedback.

---

Peter Taraba

Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2026 at 11:11 AM

From: "Marc Glisse" <[email protected]>

To: "Peter Taraba via Boost" <[email protected]>

Cc: "Peter Taraba" <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposing statsort for Boost.Sort

On Wed, 11 Mar 2026, Peter Taraba via Boost wrote:

> I'm Peter Taraba, and I've been developing a new sorting algorithm called statsort that I'd love to explore adding to Boost.Sort.

[...]

> **Benchmarks** (GCC -O3, x86-64 Linux, vs std::sort):

Wouldn't it make sense to run benchmarks against the other functions in

Boost.Sort first?

--

Marc Glisse

_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/US7CTPKDEZMEXPDS7TRGFQ3CA2HDBLA2/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.