Re: [msm] Antora documentation should reverted

Christian Granzin via Boost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 08.04.2026 um 12:21 schrieb Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost:
> El 08/04/2026 a las 11:27, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira via Boost 
> escribió:
>> It's fully broken. Compare this:
>>
>> https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_90_0/doc/antora/msm/reference/euml-operators-and-basic-helpers.html 
>>
>>
>> To this:
>>
>> https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_89_0/libs/msm/doc/HTML/ch10.html
>>
>> It's clear that nobody took the time to review the output of whatever
>> tool was used to auto-convert the old thing to Antora. This isn't the
>> only place where the Antora version is broken.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. The problem seems to be with the rendering at 
> the website, not the document generation itself. You can follow 
> progress at
>
> https://github.com/boostorg/website-v2/issues/2279
>
> Joaquín M López Muñoz
>
Sorry for the confusion caused about this matter. Vinícius is right that 
the conversion did not work correctly for this table. It was fixed 
together with some other tables that had similar issues and should 
render correctly in the upcoming 1.91 version.

What is not correct is to declare the documentation "fully broken", 
neither the claim "nobody took the time to review the output [...]".

Please check the current state on master for reference: 
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/doc/antora/msm/reference/euml-operators-and-basic-helpers.html.
If you have further findings in the MSM documentation that need to be 
addressed, I suggest to create a GitHub issue in the MSM repository.

_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7AXYXH45GUGH3QSU2EWNLMIBZ42S7COP/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.