Re: [hub] on the specialized iteration over elements
Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El 17/04/2026 a las 10:06, Alexander Grund via Boost escribió: > > Am 17.04.26 um 09:51 schrieb Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost: >> El 17/04/2026 a las 0:23, Jean-Louis Leroy via Boost escribió: >>>> Third, the interface is rather unusual, and it allows one hub to >>>> iterate >>>> over another hub's elements: >>>> >>>> hub<T> h, g; >>>> h.visit(g.begin(), g.end(), fun); >>> I guess it can be useful to iterate over a narrower range. But in >>> that spirit, I would expect 'visit' to return the "end" iterator. >> >> To be quite honest, I don't see tremendous value on iterating over a >> range narrower than the whole container, because insertion order in >> hub is arbitrary and there's no meaningul property that elements of a >> subrange would share --same rationale applies to other unordered >> containers like, for instance, std::unordered_map. The function >> visit(first, last, f) is there for operational closure reasons, so to >> say. > > If your functor could break out of iteration, like Ions suggested > visit_while it could make sense to be able to "resume" iteration where > it left off Umm, yes, that's a potential use case, thank you! FWIW, visit_while is already provided in the version of hub under review. Joaquín M López Muñoz _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BF52M464P4K6D2O4BY6VGXSF7TWEQFCH/