Re: [review] The review of boost::container::hub starts! April 16 - April 26
Christian Mazakas via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHf7xWuTmTj1JmoUbk1wzE=Sw+r2NyvJeVhisCPNj94gFtzzow@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 3:48 PM Ion Gaztañaga via Boost < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear users and members of Boost, > > I'm proud to announce that the formal review of Joaquín M López Muñoz's > boost::container::hub container, for inclusion in the Boost.Container > library, starts today ( in my timezone ;-) ), April 16, and runs through > April 26. > I'm not sure if we've already had this discussion or not but I'd actually suggest considering putting Hub either in its own library or one that's unconditionally header-only. My concern here is that if we put Hub into Container, people looking for Hub and using CMake will wind up using Boost::container which I fear transitively carries a binary dependency. I would suppose users can instead depend on the header-only meta-target (Boost::headers) but I'd prefer to avoid a situation where users must do that. - Christian _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UKM6LY2NQJTAD6C56D43TQWAB3DUMFJO/