Re: [review] The review of boost::container::hub starts! April 16 - April 26
Seth via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 19, 2026, at 10:36 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote: > This is solved by adding a new target to Boost.Container CMakeLists.txt, > e.g. `Boost::container_header_only` for the header-only bits. I would > argue, this would be useful regardless of `hub` being part of > Boost.Container. Some other libraries already provide more lightweight > targets where a full dependency would be too expensive for users. I always solve this by just depending on Boost::headers. Is there something I'm missing? Is there some added benefit of having "XXXX_header_only" targets per library as well? Seth _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/R52UP4GVWHVZ52M7N4I2HHU7CXWN4NPS/