Re: Seeking Endorsement: Boost.int128
Peter Dimov via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matt Borland wrote: > Dear All, > > I am seeking endorsement for review of my library int128 [1]. The library > requires only C++14, is header only, and has no mandatory dependencies. > What does int128 provide? Two portable and performant types: a 128-bit > signed integer and a 128-bit unsigned integer, as well as a standard library for > them. The performance of these types have been tuned and tested on a > variety of architectures to include: x64, x32, s390x, ARM64, ARM32, PPC64LE. > Both of the types and most of their library functions also work inside CUDA > kernels. Benchmarks against Boost.Multiprecision, Absl, MSVC's software 128- > bit integers, and built-ins, are available [2]. How does this relate to / interact with __(u)int128_t? _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UDPBGRRXBJWVGBOW2CDR2ZHLTUTAULZJ/